🔗 Share this article

Energy analysts have voiced considerable caution regarding optimistic claims that American oil giants will swiftly pump tens of billions of dollars to revive the country's dilapidated oil infrastructure.

Requirement of Iron-Clad Assurances

Without an “iron-clad guarantee” of financial backing from the Washington, analysts expect multinational oil companies to move with significant hesitation.

“It is premature to speculate on any potential investments,” a spokesperson said this weekend.

The ambitious timeline of less than a year and a half has been boldly proposed. Yet, realistic assessments indicate a different picture.

A Probable Timeline

“Chances are going to take 36 months for any significant output increase,” noted an industry expert.

He suggested operators would likely spend:

• Initial phase: Navigating new government and security contracts.
• Year two: Investing in reconstruction of infrastructure.
• Final phase: Starting to meaningfully increase production.

This would lead to an boost of around 500,000 bpd possibly by the end of the decade.

Appetite Compared to Readiness for Investment

There is a critical difference between firms' attention and their readiness to commit significantly.

“In my view their curiosity is an high score, on a range of ten. I think their readiness is a four or five, because there is no clarity yet.”

Veteran operators in the region share this view. The thinking is that majors will publicly talk up the opportunity while actually acting with deliberate slowness.

The Vast Cost

The financial outlay would be enormous. Research analysis suggest that increasing production by between half a million and a million bpd would require more than $10 billion in funding over two to three years.

Yet, restoring production to previous levels of around 2.5 million bpd could require a monumental $80 billion to $90 billion over six or seven years.

The Unanswered Issue of Federal Guarantees

The idea of firms being paid back by the US taxpayer has been repeatedly mentioned. However, specific plans on such a mechanism have not yet been announced.

The absence of certainty is the main reason for the sector's reluctance. Firms seek protection against nationalization and the possibility that a future president could refuse any agreement.

“You need to be shielded from nationalization, that we’ve witnessed in Venezuela previously.”

Therefore, while political optimism runs high, the practical realities suggest a path of slow deliberation for any significant venture in the country's energy industry.